Pablo Carreno-Busta vs Conor Niland Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L L L
Form
L L W W L L L L L LHead To Head: Carreno-Busta 1 - 0 Niland
They have played 3 sets in total, with Carreno-Busta winning 2 and Niland winning 1. The last match between Carreno-Busta and Niland was at the Open Sud de France - Montpellier, 29-01-2012, Q2 round, I.hard with Pablo Carreno-Busta getting the victory 4-6 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno-Busta | 1 |
| Conor Niland | 0 |
Open Sud de France - Montpellier(29-01-2012)
4
6
6
2
7
6
| Carreno-Busta | Stats | Niland |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 96 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 10 | Highest Rank | 129 |
| 33 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 32 | Titles | 10 |
| 63% (589-339) | Career Total W/L | 56% (268-207) |
| $10,361,715 | Career Prize Money | $56,485 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Popyrin VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carreno-Busta VS Niland H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Conor Niland
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
80)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Carreno-Busta VS Niland H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:14:1 | Average Match Time | 2:14:1 |
| 60% (54/90) | 1st Serve % | 78% (80/102) |
| 74% (40/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (50/80) |
| 53% (19/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 43% (44/102) | Return Points Win % | 34% (31/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pablo Carreno-Busta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
28 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
73 of
113)
1st Serve %
72%
(
86 of
119)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Jakub Paul
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
47%
(
39 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Iliyan Radulov
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
95 of
151)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
56 of
95)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
69 of
151)
132
Total Points Won
110
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Pedro Cachin
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Conor Niland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Bhambri
Player
Conor Niland
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Conor Niland
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-1 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Conor Niland
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
80)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conor Niland
Player
Dorian Descloix
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephane Bohli
Player
Conor Niland
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (589/339) | Win/Loss | 56% (268/207) |
| 60% (1381/908) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (614/499) |
| 54% (11699/10152) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5408/4879) |
| 65% (186/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (82/62) |
| 66% (346/178) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (87/61) |
| 52% (51/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (88/72) |
| 30% (6/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2765 | Aces Total | 281 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1326 | Total Double Faults | 345 |
| 1:20:32 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 470.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 536.85 |
| 64% (34278/53752) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3946/6271) |
| 70% (23909/34278) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2643/3946) |
| 52% (10103/19469) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1093/2325) |
| 42% (2202/5305) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (266/650) |
| 39% (21181/54341) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2460/6162) |
| 60% (58/39) | Slam W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 53% (69/60) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (10/8) | Cups W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 56% (167/129) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (12/15) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (136/57) | Challenger W/L | 51% (101/98) |
| 77% (144/43) | Futures W/L | 66% (134/69) |
| 64% (522/816) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (255/445) |
| 59% (59/100) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 56% (200/356) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (49/111) |
| 55% (162/294) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (79/145) |
| 86% (575/496) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (256/216) |
| 13% (575/77) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (256/40) |
| 26% (351/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (219/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
